Thursday, November 21, 2024
spot_img

When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Here’s how it works.

Older Workers Who Find Themselves Unemployed

Displaced Workers; Bureau Of Labor Statistics

From January 2007 through December 2009, 6.9 million workers were displaced from jobs they had held for at least 3 years, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. This was nearly twice as many as were displaced for the survey period covering January 2005 to December 2007. In January 2010, about half of displaced workers were reemployed, down from about two-thirds for the prior survey in January 2008. The more recent period includes the recession that began in December 2007. In contrast, the prior survey covered a period of employment growth and declining unemployment.

Since 1984, the Employment and Training Administration of the U.S. Department of Labor has sponsored surveys that collect information on  workers who were displaced from their jobs. These surveys have been conducted biennially as supplements to the Current Population Survey (CPS), a monthly survey of house-holds that is the primary source of information on the nation’s labor force.

Displaced workers are defined as persons 20 years of age and older who lost or left jobs because their plant or company closed or moved, there was insufficient work for them to do, or their position or shift was abolished. The period covered in this study was 2007-09, the 3 calendar years prior to the January 2010 survey date. The following analysis focuses primarily on the 6.9 million persons who had worked for their employer for 3 or more years at the time of displacement (referred to as long-tenured). An additional 8.5 million
persons were displaced from jobs they had held for less than 3 years (referred to as short-tenured). Combining the short- and long-tenured groups, the number of displaced workers totaled 15.4 million from 2007-09, up from 8.3 million for the period covered by the prior survey (2005-07).

Highlights from the January 2010 survey include:

   –In January 2010, 49 percent of the 6.9 million long-tenured displaced
     workers were reemployed, down from 67 percent for the prior survey in
     January 2008. This is lowest reemployment rate on record for the series,
     which began in 1984. (See table 1.)

   –Forty-three percent of long-tenured displaced workers cited insuffi-
     cient work as the reason for their displacement, up from 24 percent
     for the previous survey. (See table 2.)

   –Nearly 1 in 4 long-tenured displaced workers lost a job in manufac-
     turing. (See table 4.)

   –Among long-tenured workers who were displaced from full-time wage
     and salary jobs and who were reemployed in such jobs, 45 percent had
     earnings that were as much or more than those on the lost job. This
     was lower than the proportion in January 2008, when 55 percent of
     those workers had earnings equal to or greater than those on the lost
     job. (See table 7.)

Characteristics of the Reemployed

Forty-nine percent of the 6.9 million long-tenured displaced workers were reemployed at the time of the survey in January 2010, down from 67 percent for the January 2008 survey. The proportion unemployed at the time of the most recent survey, 36 percent, was double the proportion in January 2008 (18 percent). Fifteen percent of long-tenured displaced workers were not in the labor force in January 2010, the same as in the previous survey. (See table 1.)

In January 2010, reemployment rates for workers ages 20 to 24 and 25 to 54 were 55 and 53 percent, respectively. Reemployment rates for older workers ages 55 to 64 and 65 years and over–were 39 and 23 percent, respectively. Among most age groups, displaced workers were less likely to be employed and more likely to be unemployed than they were in the prior survey. Among those age 65 and over, 45 percent were no longer in the labor force when surveyed in January 2010, down from 69 percent in January 2008.

Among the displaced, men and women (49 percent) were equally likely to have found a new job at the time of the survey in January 2010. The reemployment rates for both men and women declined from the prior survey. Displaced men were somewhat more likely than displaced women to be unemployed at the time of the survey–39 versus 31 percent. The share of displaced women who had left the labor force, at 20 percent, was greater than that for men–12 percent.

In January 2010, the reemployment rates for long-tenured displaced whites (50 percent), Hispanics (49 percent), blacks (43 percent), and Asians (38 percent) declined from the rates recorded in the January 2008 survey.

Reason for Job Loss and Receipt of Advance Notice

Of the 6.9 million long-tenured workers displaced during the January 2007 through
December 2009 period, 43 percent cited insufficient work, 31 percent lost or left their jobs due to plant or company closings or moves, and 27 percent reported that their position or shift was abolished as the reason for being displaced. The proportion of displaced workers citing plant closings or moves or an abolished shift or position decreased from the prior survey, while the share reporting insufficient work increased. In prior displaced worker survey periods, plant or company closings or moves had been the most frequently stated reason for displacement.

Thirty-seven percent of long-tenured displaced workers in the January 2010 survey received written advance notice that their jobs would be terminated, down from 43 percent in the prior survey. Workers who lost jobs due to plant or company closings or moves were most likely to receive written advance notice. Of this group, 55 percent received such notice. In contrast, 37 percent of workers who were displaced because their position or shift was abolished and 24 percent of those who lost jobs due to insufficient work were notified in advance. For each of these groups, however, receipt of written advance notice had little impact on the likelihood of being reemployed at the time of the survey in January 2010.

Industry and Occupation

As was the case in prior surveys, manufacturing accounted for the largest number of
displaced workers. During the 2007-09 period 1.6 million factory workers were displaced from their jobs–23 percent of all long-tenured displaced workers. Manufacturing displacements were again concentrated within the durable goods component (1.1 million), particularly in transportation equipment and in computers and electronic products. Workers in wholesale and retail trade accounted for 14 percent, and construction made up 13 percent of all long-tenured displaced.

The reemployment rates for workers displaced from construction (49 percent) and
wholesale and retail trade (49 percent) were the same as the overall reemployment rate for displaced workers. (Workers were not necessarily reemployed in the same industries from which they were displaced.) By comparison, reemployment rates for workers displaced from jobs in financial activities (58 percent), education and health services (57 percent), and government (55 percent) were above the overall reemployment rate. Displaced manufacturing workers (39 percent) were the least likely to be reemployed at the time of the survey.

Compared with the prior survey, the number of displaced workers was higher for all
occupation groups in January 2010. Reemployment rates differed by occupation, but were highest for those employed in professional and related occupations (60 percent) and lowest for those in production occupations (37 percent).
Geographic Divisions

Compared to the prior survey period, the number of long-tenured workers displaced during 2007-09 was higher in every geographic division of the United States. In January 2010, those residing in the West North Central division had the highest reemployment rates; about 60 percent of the displaced in this region were reemployed at the time of the survey. About one-quarter of displaced manufacturing workers lived in the East North Central division.

Earnings

Of the 2.9 million displaced workers who lost full-time wage and salary jobs during the 2007-09 period and were reemployed in January 2010, 2.2 million had found full-time wage and salary jobs. Of these reemployed full-time workers who reported earnings on their lost job, 45 percent were earning as much or more than they did prior to displacement; the proportion was 55 percent in the January 2008 survey. In the most recent survey, 36 percent reported earnings losses of 20 percent or more.

Total Displaced Workers (With No Tenure Restriction)

The total number of workers displaced between January 2007 and December 2009 (re-
gardless of how long they had held their jobs) was 15.4 million, up by 7.2 million from the previous survey period. Of the total number of workers who lost jobs over the 2007-09 period, 49 percent were reemployed and 36 percent were unemployed in January 2010. In the January 2008 survey, 67 percent of the total displaced were reemployed and 19 percent were unemployed.


Next:  Reason For Job LossBureau Of Statistic January 2010

Labor Force

The civilian labor force is projected to grow by 12.6 million between 2008 and 2018, to 166.9 million persons. Slower population growth and adecreasing over-all labor force participation rate are expected to contribute to a slowdown in labor force growth. The projected 8.2-percent increase for the 2008-18 period  is less than the 12.1-percent growth that occurred between 1998 and 2008.

As the members of the large baby boom generation grow older and continue their trend of increased labor force participation, the number of persons age 55 years and older in the labor force is expected to increase by 12.0 million, or 43.0
percent, during the 2008-18 period. Persons in the 55 years and older age group are projected to make up nearly one-quarter of the labor force in 2018. Young  people (age 16-24) are expected to account for 12.7 percent of the labor force in 2018, and persons in the prime-age working group (age 25 to 54) to account for 63.5 percent of the 2018 labor force.



The labor force in 2018 will be more diverse. As a result of higher population
growth among minorities–due to higher birth rates and increased immigration,
along with higher labor force participation rates by Hispanics and Asians–the share of the labor force held by minorities is projected to increase significantly. Whites will remain the largest race group in the labor force in 2018 (79.4 percent) despite growing by just 5.5 percent between 2008 and 2018. The  number of Asians in the labor force is projected to increase by 29.8 percent and the number of blacks by 14.1 percent. In 2018, Asians are projected to comprise 5.6 percent of the labor force and blacks to make up 12.1 percent.

Hispanics (who can be of any race) will join the labor force in greater numbers than non-Hispanics. The number of Hispanics in the labor force is projected to
grow by 7.3 million or 33.1 percent. Their share of the labor force will expand from 14.3 percent in 2008 to 17.6 percent in 2018. In contrast, the number of persons in the labor force not of Hispanic origin is expected to grow by 4.0 percent, and their share of the labor force to decline to 82.4 percent.

Occupational Employment

Two major occupational groups–professional and related occupations and service
occupations are projected to provide more than half of the total employment
growth during the 2008-18 period. Production occupations are projected to decline.

The 30 detailed occupations with the largest gains in employment are expected to account for nearly half of all new jobs, and 17 of these occupations are professional and related occupations and service occupations.



The detailed occupation
projected to add the most jobs is registered nurses (582,000), followed by home health aides (461,000) and customer service representatives (400,000). All but 3
of the top 30 fastest-growing detailed occupations are found within professional and related occupations and service occupations. Seventeen of these rapidly growing occupations are related to healthcare or medical research.


RELATED ARTICLES

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

- Advertisment -
Google search engine

Most Popular

Recent Comments